How to Fight VA Claim Denials

by

When the letter arrives with the words “VA Claim Denied,” it feels like a gut punch. You’ve endured the physical and mental tolls of your service, painstakingly gathered your records, and waited months, sometimes years, only to be told no. This guide is your definitive blueprint for fighting back. It’s not about giving up or accepting defeat. It’s about understanding the specific reasons for your denial and systematically building a case so airtight the VA has no choice but to reconsider. The path is complex, but with the right strategy, tools, and evidence, you can navigate the system and secure the benefits you earned.

The Immediate Aftermath: Decoding Your Denial Letter

Your VA denial letter, or Decision Notice, is the most crucial document you will receive. It is not just a rejection; it is a roadmap for your appeal. Before you do anything else, you must read it with a meticulous eye.

Every denial is based on one or more of three core reasons:

  • No Service Connection: The VA doesn’t believe your current medical condition is linked to your military service. This is the most common reason for denial.

  • No Current Diagnosis: The VA does not believe you have a current, medically diagnosed disability. They may acknowledge an in-service injury but argue you have since recovered.

  • Insufficient Evidence: The VA believes you have not provided enough medical or lay evidence to support your claim. This often overlaps with a lack of service connection.

The letter will outline the specific evidence the VA reviewed and what medical opinions, including your Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, were considered. It will also explicitly state the laws and regulations applied to your case. Your job is to identify the exact deficiency the VA found. Did they say your in-service event was not a “stressor” for your PTSD? Did a C&P examiner state your back pain was “less likely than not” caused by your heavy lifting in the Army? This is the target you will be aiming for with your appeal.

The letter will also provide information on the three decision review options available to you under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA). You have one year from the date on your denial letter to select one of these paths. Missing this deadline is a fatal error that can cost you your original effective date.

The Three Pillars of Appeal: Choosing Your Strategic Path

The AMA provides three distinct lanes for an appeal, each designed for a different situation. Choosing the correct path from the beginning is the most critical decision you will make.

1. The Supplemental Claim: For New and Relevant Evidence

This is your most powerful tool if your denial was due to “insufficient evidence” or a “lack of service connection.” A Supplemental Claim is used when you have new evidence to introduce that was not part of your original claim.

When to Choose This Path:

  • You have a new nexus letter from a private doctor.

  • You have new private medical records or a new diagnosis that the VA did not previously consider.

  • You have new lay statements or “buddy statements” from a veteran you served with or a family member who witnessed your condition.

  • Your condition is now a “presumptive condition” under a new law, such as the PACT Act.

How to File a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995):

  1. Gather Your New Evidence: The core of a supplemental claim is the new information. The evidence must be “new” (not previously submitted) and “relevant” (it must have a bearing on the issue and potentially change the outcome).

  2. Complete VA Form 20-0995: This is the Decision Review Request: Supplemental Claim form. You must list the denied issue and specify the new evidence you are submitting.

  3. Submit the Form and Evidence: You can file online, by mail, or in person at a regional office. Be sure to submit all your new evidence along with the form.

Concrete Example: Your claim for a back injury was denied because the VA determined there was no “nexus” or connection to your service. The denial letter mentioned a C&P examiner concluded your condition was “degenerative” and “less likely than not” caused by your military duties. Your new strategy is to file a Supplemental Claim with a private doctor’s nexus letter that specifically refutes the VA’s opinion, stating your condition is “at least as likely as not” a result of the specific, documented lifting requirements of your MOS. This new, direct evidence is a game-changer.

2. The Higher-Level Review (HLR): For Errors in the Record

This option is for when you believe the VA made a mistake based on the evidence that was already in your file. An HLR is a formal review of your claim by a senior, more experienced rater who has the authority to correct errors.

When to Choose This Path:

  • You believe the initial rater overlooked a key piece of evidence, such as a buddy statement or a specific entry in your service treatment records (STRs).

  • You think the rater misinterpreted a medical opinion or misapplied a regulation.

  • The denial was based on an inaccurate C&P exam, and you can point to specific evidence in your file that contradicts the exam’s findings.

  • The VA failed to fulfill its “duty to assist” you in gathering records.

How to File an HLR (VA Form 20-0996):

  1. Do Not Submit New Evidence: This is the most important rule of the HLR. If you submit new evidence, the VA will automatically switch your appeal to a Supplemental Claim. The senior rater will only review the evidence that was available at the time of the original decision.

  2. Complete VA Form 20-0996: This is the Decision Review Request: Higher-Level Review form.

  3. Request an Informal Conference: This is an optional but highly recommended step. During this phone call, you can speak directly with the senior reviewer and point out the specific errors you believe were made in the original decision. This is your chance to concisely explain what the first rater missed.

Concrete Example: Your claim for a shoulder condition was denied. In the denial letter, the VA stated there was no in-service event recorded. You look at your records and find a specific entry in your STRs from 2008 where you were seen for a shoulder injury. This was a clear error. You file an HLR, specifically pointing to that date and page number in your STRs. You also request an informal conference to verbally highlight this discrepancy to the reviewer. The senior rater reviews the file, finds the overlooked record, and overturns the denial.

3. The Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA): For the Long Haul

A Board Appeal is the most formal and lengthy appeal process. Your case is reviewed by a Veterans Law Judge (VLJ) at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals in Washington, D.C. The BVA offers three dockets, each with different options.

When to Choose This Path:

  • You have exhausted the other two options.

  • You have a complex legal or medical issue that requires the attention of a judge.

  • You want a formal hearing to present your case directly.

The Three BVA Dockets (VA Form 10182):

  1. Direct Review: The fastest of the three. A judge reviews your claim based on the existing evidence. No new evidence or hearing is allowed. Best for when you’re confident an error was made and just want a judge to review it.

  2. Evidence Submission: The most common docket. Allows you to submit new evidence to the Board. The deadline for new evidence is 90 days from when the Board receives your appeal. This is similar to a Supplemental Claim but with a judge reviewing it.

  3. Hearing: The longest docket. You get to have a hearing with a Veterans Law Judge, which can be in person (in D.C.), via videoconference, or by phone. At the hearing, you can provide testimony and submit new evidence within 90 days of the hearing. This is best for complex cases where your personal testimony is crucial, such as with mental health claims like PTSD.

Building Your Evidence Arsenal: The Key to Overturning a Denial

The most successful appeals are built on a foundation of unassailable evidence. Your goal is to provide the VA with a body of evidence so compelling that it forces a favorable decision.

The Indisputable Power of the Nexus Letter

A nexus letter, also known as an Independent Medical Opinion (IMO), is a medical expert’s opinion connecting your current diagnosed condition to a specific event or stressor in your military service. If your claim was denied for “lack of service connection,” this is your single most important piece of evidence.

What Makes a Nexus Letter a Game-Changer:

  • The Right Physician: The letter must be from a qualified medical professional, preferably a specialist in your condition (e.g., a neurologist for a traumatic brain injury, an orthopedic surgeon for a joint condition, a psychologist or psychiatrist for PTSD).

  • The Magic Words: The letter must use specific language that meets the VA’s evidentiary standard. The physician must state that your condition is “at least as likely as not” due to your military service. Opinions that use weaker language, like “possibly related” or “could be caused by,” will not be effective.

  • A Solid Rationale: The letter must provide a detailed explanation of how and why the physician reached their conclusion. This means referencing your service treatment records, any in-service event records, and a thorough review of your current medical history. The doctor should explicitly state they reviewed these documents.

  • Concrete Example of a Strong Nexus Letter Statement: “Based on my review of [Veteran’s Name]’s service treatment records, including the entry on June 15, 2005, detailing a fall from a truck bed, and my review of his current civilian medical records from my practice, it is my professional medical opinion that his chronic low back pain is at least as likely as not a direct result of the in-service injury he sustained. The degenerative changes noted on the recent MRI are consistent with the long-term effects of such a traumatic event.”

The Crucial Role of Lay and Buddy Statements

Lay statements are written accounts from you, a family member, or a fellow service member that provide firsthand witness to your condition. They are powerful because they fill in the gaps where military or medical records may be silent.

How to Craft a Powerful Lay Statement (VA Form 21-10210):

  • Tell a Story: Don’t just state facts. Describe the event, the aftermath, and the long-term impact on your life.

  • Be Specific and Chronological: Use dates, times, and places. “On deployment to Iraq in 2006, I was present when [Veteran’s Name] experienced the IED blast. I saw the aftermath and witnessed his immediate change in behavior, including increased irritability and nightmares.”

  • Describe the Impact: Detail how the condition affects your daily life. “Since he returned from service, I have watched him struggle with chronic headaches. They are so severe that he has to lie down in a dark room for hours, which has made it impossible for him to hold a steady job or participate in family events.”

The C&P Exam: Challenging a Negative Report

A negative or inaccurate C&P exam is a frequent cause of denial. You can challenge this by introducing new evidence that directly contradicts the C&P examiner’s findings.

How to Rebut a Bad C&P Exam:

  1. Obtain a Copy of the Report: File a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or simply ask your VSO or attorney to get a copy of the C&P exam report.

  2. Identify the Inaccuracies: Did the examiner fail to review your entire file? Did they mischaracterize your symptoms or your range of motion? Did they ignore a traumatic event you described?

  3. Write a Rebuttal Statement: Write a detailed lay statement explaining why you believe the C&P exam was flawed. Point to specific parts of the report and contrast them with the facts and other evidence in your file.

  4. Secure an Independent Medical Opinion (IMO): The most effective way to challenge a negative C&P exam is with a nexus letter or an IMO from a private physician that directly addresses the findings of the C&P report and provides a contrary opinion. Your new doctor should explicitly state they reviewed the C&P exam and disagree with its conclusions, providing a strong medical rationale for their opposing view.

Concrete Scenarios: Applying the Strategy to Real-World Denials

To illustrate how these strategies work in practice, let’s look at two common denial scenarios.

Scenario 1: Denial for PTSD Due to “Lack of a Credible Stressor”

The Denial: You filed a claim for PTSD. The VA acknowledged you have a diagnosis of PTSD but denied the claim, stating there was no “stressor” proven in your military records. You were a supply clerk and didn’t serve in a combat role, and your service records are silent about any traumatic event.

The Strategy: You choose the Supplemental Claim path because you have new and relevant evidence to submit.

  1. Gather New Evidence: You find two fellow service members who were with you when a serious vehicle accident occurred during a convoy, but it was not officially documented. You get detailed, signed buddy statements from them describing the event and your emotional change afterward. You also get a lay statement from your spouse, describing your nightmares and hypervigilance that began immediately upon your return from that deployment.

  2. Nexus Letter: You get an IMO from a private psychiatrist who reviews your military records, the new buddy statements, and your spouse’s statement. The psychiatrist writes a strong nexus letter, concluding that your PTSD is “at least as likely as not” a result of the traumatic event described in the lay statements.

  3. File the Claim: You file VA Form 20-0995 with all of this new evidence. The VA now has a documented stressor and a strong medical opinion to connect it to your diagnosis.

Scenario 2: Denial for a Back Condition Due to “No Service Connection”

The Denial: Your claim for a back condition was denied. The VA acknowledged your current diagnosis but stated in the denial letter that there was no in-service event recorded and the C&P examiner concluded your condition was “unlikely to be service-connected.”

The Strategy: You decide to file a Higher-Level Review first because you believe the VA made a clear error.

  1. Review the Record: You go back to your service treatment records and find a physical therapy referral from 1998, just before you were separated from the service. The referral notes “chronic back pain.” The VA rater missed this crucial piece of evidence that shows your condition began in service.

  2. File HLR and Request Conference: You file VA Form 20-0996, specifically requesting an informal conference. During the conference, you politely but firmly point out the exact page number and date of the physical therapy referral. You explain that this is a direct contradiction to the C&P examiner’s finding of no in-service event.

  3. The Result: The senior reviewer sees the error in the original decision and overturns the denial, granting service connection for your back condition. If the HLR had been unsuccessful, you would then file a Supplemental Claim with a private doctor’s nexus letter, directly challenging the C&P examiner’s opinion with new evidence.

The Power of Representation: A Final Consideration

Navigating this appeals process can be overwhelming. You do not have to do it alone.

  • Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs): Organizations like the American Legion, Disabled American Veterans (DAV), and Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) have accredited representatives who provide free assistance. They can help you file your claim, gather evidence, and track your appeal. They are a valuable first-line resource.

  • VA-Accredited Attorneys and Claims Agents: For complex, long-running, or highly contested cases, an accredited attorney or claims agent can be an invaluable asset. They have legal expertise and can argue your case before the Board or even the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC). Unlike VSOs, they can charge fees for their services, which are regulated by the VA.

The Path Forward

Receiving a VA claim denial is not the end of the road. It is a new beginning on a more focused, strategic path. Your denial letter is your starting point, not your finish line. By carefully analyzing the denial, choosing the right appeal lane, and meticulously building a new body of evidence, you can transform a rejection into a victory. The key is to be deliberate, organized, and relentless in your pursuit of the benefits you so rightly deserve.